that's the problem with old men

-

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang again, this time with commentary--Robert Downey, Jr, Val Kilmer and Shane Black.

Also, I did see The Hateful Eight today. And, I've got a love/hate relationship with its Tarantino. Not love it or hate it, but more like both at the same time. I mean, take Super Panavision 70mm, use it beautifully for a some landscape shots and a bit of the first act Stagecoach... homage? ripoff? Then, you set most of the film in an enclosed space where the wide shot really doesn't matter that much. Take the requisite A [insert director's name] Film and turn it into the pretentious the 8th film by Quentin Tarantino and then give us chapter headings as well? Tarantino has these tics that bug the crap out of me. And he's arrogant. (Don't get me started on his tiff with the Cinerama Dome, because, yeah, they want to take Star Wars out after a week.) But, the guy can make a film. I mean, sure, The Hateful Eight hits a lot of beats we've seen before, and Kurt Russell is doing his best John Wayne and Walter Goggins and Samuel L. Jackson are mostly playing their usual characters--

(Which really isn't necessarily that bad a thing when it comes to a western, I suppose. I mean, watching all those westerns back in June, aside from all those story fixtures that Wright explores in Sixguns and Society, you get a whole lot of actors who the genre keeps returning to--personas that you just don't expect to be that different from film to film. It's a genre built on tough guys, not necessarily emotionally deep, seriously acting, guys. Even John Wayne in The Searchers--clearly Ethan is an emotionally deep guy going through some shit, but most of that comes from his actions, and occasionally in his words, but you don't go to a John Wayne film expecting long moments of emoting. As long as you can tell one character from another within a specific film, that's good enough. Sometimes.)

--but it's still a solid film.

By the way, on the commentary track here, they just commented on the chapter titles in this film, and I gotta say, they work better here than in The Hateful Eight. Here, they tie together with the voiceover to make this feel like a pulp novel thrown up onto the big screen. For westerns, except for, say, How the West Was Won--which is not the western vibe you want to go for... ever--westerns don't do the chapter thing. Westerns are more straightforward. You don't get a lot of flashbacks, certainly not extended ones like in The Hateful Eight. Despite some complaints I've seen about The Hateful Eight and its excessive dialogue, it's not like westerns are all action all the time.

And, for the record, Kurt Russell's John Wayne is great.

Plus, Tarantino should totally try his hand at a hard boiled detective story, with voiceover...

Oh, there's that. Fourth chapter of The Hateful Eight and had to be more than an hour in and suddenly Tarantino himself starts doing some narration like he's going for a Hugh-Ross-in-The-Assassination-of-Jesse-James-by-the-Coward-Robert-Ford vibe and it doesn't really work, and doesn't give us any information the film won't provide us later. And, it's only around for a minute or two, then even more briefly at one later point in the film. It's just so arbitrary. Meanwhile, here I am watching Kiss Kiss Bang Bang where voiceover adds real information, adds jokes, adds more depth to the main character and deconstructs the film itself. Obviously, I'm not a huge fan of voiceover, but it can be used well.

And, as I think I already said, I liked The Hateful Eight. I'm just better at being negative than being positive. I could get into SPOILER territory and complain about who turns out to be the bad guy in the film, but really, the various characters worked (Jennifer Jason Leigh's Daisy is so over-the-top in some moments that he subtle moments almost get lost, but she deserves the nominations she's getting for the role) and their interactions were good. The Tarantino dialogue--if you like that sort of thing--was, as they say, on point.

 

 

 

 

 

And, the commentary track on Kiss Kiss Bang Bang is as distracting as the film is. These guys are hilarious.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

la fille que j'aimera sera comme bon vin

-
Image
Phil Connors doesn’t speak French. While it might be reasonable to assume Phil does learn to play piano beyond the two songs we hear him play since this is at the point he is actually trying to better himself and affect the world around him in a positive way, the French bit is much earlier. It also comes from a bit in Rubin’s original screenplay, not with Rita but with “Tess Harper—Jefferson County Poetry Society.” Basically, it’s a clear example of Phil doing the same thing he does with Nancy in the movie; he makes stuff up to get what he wants. This is only Day 10 . He hasn’t gotten to the depression that arguably makes him realize he’s an actual human being like everyone else around him… I just realized, this also means he’s probably lying when he says, “Small town people are more real, more down-to-earth.” Later, he might actually believe it. But, at this point, each line is just a move to win over Rita. Anyway, in the original screenplay, Phil meets Tess like he meets Mary in ...
Read more

i've seen it over a hundred times

-
Image
As I write this, it’s Day 2 for Phil Connors on the DVD and my daughters are in the kitchen making a cake to celebrate Day 100 for me... photo should be below. The movie Phil had seen over 100 times (or so he tells Laraine) was Heidi II . It’s a “family classic” according to the Alpine Theater’s marquee. But, as I’ve mentioned before, it doesn’t exist. Originally, the movie that Phil could see every day if he wanted to do so was It’s a Wonderful Life . Danny Rubin’s ego—and this is his suggestion, not mine—made him believe Groundhog Day “a timeless quality and had the potential to become a film that could work for audiences for a very long time.” So, he put another such film on the marquee. But, “even believing that Groundhog Day was a potential classic, [Rubin] never was thinking of comparing it to It’s a Wonderful Life “— (I’d say putting that title on the marquee was Rubin deliberately comparing the two, but maybe that’s just me.) . Rubin continues: “But the similarities bet...
Read more

the wretch, concentred all in self

-
So, Rita thinks Phil’s defining characteristic is his egocentrism. At the point in the story that she quotes Sir Walter Scott, it’s Day 4 for Phil (See the previous entry for a list of Phil’s days) and I wouldn’t argue that he isn’t egocentric. He’s still a jerk, taking advantage of his situation for fun. He’s manipulated Nancy for sex, has gone out on his costumed date to see Heidi II with the woman in the French maid costume. He’s just figured out the whole lack-of-consequences side of things with the help of Ralph and Gus. And, he’s sitting around loading up on, well, probably every dessert the Tip Top Café offers. His focus at this point is very much himself. But, a closer look at the lines Rita quotes got me to thinking, is Phil the man unsung by minstrels because he’s too self-centered? What Rita quotes is some lines from Canto VI of Sir Walter Scott’s “The Lay of the Last Minstrel.” The larger poem involves some clans at war with one another, but this particular section invol...
Read more