Posts

Showing posts with the label phaedrus

take a deep breath

In the fall, I wrote three big papers. Two of them linked to Groundhog Day --my Christ-Figure paper and my confirmation bias paper--but the third--my rhetoric paper--did not. It was very sad. This quarter, I'm actually rewriting (and doubling in length) that rhetoric paper, and while I haven't figured out quite how to justify including a reference to Groundhog Day because there aren't really a bunch of movie examples, I did discover a quotation in one of my sources that fits into a discussion of Groundhog Day . It's a little backward, but it almost makes up for my inability to include it. (A sad sidenote: out of my three papers in this winter quarter, nary a one makes mention of Groundhog Day . I have clearly not been trying hard enough.) Anyway, the line, from Schiltz (2006): As we have seen, on the one hand, the account provided in Plato's Phaedrus makes the further move toward one in which the sensual desires are instrumentally valuable as motivation for ...

i'm gonna stay here and finish

Continuing from yesterday , like I have done twice before , it's impromptu quotation tie-in night. I meant to do all 21 quotations from round 2 of impromptu from yesterday's tournament, but I was apparently quite tired. I actually don't usually get so exhausted from a tournament as a coach as I used to get as a competitor, but it was a long three days. I've got a few weekends off now before another 3-day tournament. In the meantime, The Groundhog Day Project continues. "What I like in a good author is not what he says but what he whispers." - Logan Pearsall Smith. To tie this to Groundhog Day the first step is to broaden it a bit so it isn't all about authors--our quiet actions are more genuine than our louder actions, I might say. Our best actions are not the ones about which we take the time to boast. Pre-loop Phil Connors is the kind of guy who would boast about most anything he could. Rita calls him incredible--and just did this as the movie play...